The Supreme Court on Friday modified its earlier order on stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR region, calling the previous directions “too harsh”. The court had previously ruled that all stray dogs be rounded up and permanently housed in shelters, a decision that sparked criticism from animal activists and dog lovers.

A three-judge bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice NV Anjaria noted that the August 11 order prohibiting the release of vaccinated dogs was issued without assessing the infrastructure and human resources available with municipal bodies. The bench observed that such blanket directions could lead to a “catch-22 situation” as they would be nearly impossible to implement.

In its revised order, the court ruled that stray dogs may be released back into their original localities after sterilisation, in line with Animal Birth Control (ABC) rules. Exceptions will be made for aggressive dogs or those infected with rabies. The court also directed that feeding stray dogs in public places be avoided and that dedicated feeding zones be established in each ward.

Additionally, a helpline will be set up for residents to report violations of the court’s orders, which are to be followed nationwide. The court warned activists and others not to obstruct municipal workers during the sterilisation and release process.

The updated directive has been welcomed by animal rights activists and political leaders. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi called it a “compassionate approach” that balances public safety and animal welfare. PETA India expressed gratitude, while former Union Minister Maneka Gandhi praised the decision but urged clarity on what constitutes “aggressive” behavior in dogs.

The original order had come after a spate of stray dog attacks in Delhi-NCR, but faced significant backlash from animal welfare groups. The court’s new approach prioritizes sterilisation and controlled feeding rather than mass confinement.